>there are a near infinite variety of reasons for being homeless Ah, the old "flatten that distribution graph and treat every point as equally probable" argume

>there are a near infinite variety of reasons for being homeless Ah, the old "flatten that distribution graph and treat every point as equally probable" argument. Arguments like these are so intentionally misleading that it's easy to construe them as malicious. You'd rather make an asinine point than use language that addresses the true distribution of the problem set, because it doesn't capture every single fringe case you can think of.