Very true, deers in some area's do require population control due to the impending impact they would have upon an area. This you see play out in contained park

Very true, deers in some area's do require population control due to the impending impact they would have upon an area. This you see play out in contained parks/area (ie - cut off) like for example Richmond Park in Surrey which closes twice a year for such culling, of which has David Attenborough as a patron. They do cover the issue here:- https://www.frp.org.uk/deer-cull-royal-parks-advice/ https://www.frp.org.uk/deer-cull-royal-parks-advice/ It is a balance and yes, the let's save everything mentality can play out detrimentality in society and that alas gets down to lack of knowledge upon the matter - always, which we see play out on both sides of the political spectrum. Though another one still up in the air are Foxes, historically they used to do fox hunts to control the population - which I'd say is the other side of the fence as whilst the motives originally where good (farmers and foxes do not mix if large populations of foxes), the approach of the culling is a inhumane, barbaric and ritualised sport. So you end up with fox hunting banned, but without any other forms of control in place you end up with, and we have with foxes spreading into towns and see an increase in children and pets attacked, which has happened. But the hey they are cute patrols will overlook that aspect. It is a fine balance, one in which as a species we kinda hypocrite impose. After all, I'm sure many animals if they could speak would say that humans need population management due to the environmental impact they have. Which in many aspects, opens up a whole new level of debate that nobody really wants to discuss. Though nobody looks at shark attacks upon people as environmental conservation oddly enough.