Congrats. It's the first essay I read that addresses most big issues, including the (broken) PI model and how most senior authors use peer review in a monopolis

Congrats. It's the first essay I read that addresses most big issues, including the (broken) PI model and how most senior authors use peer review in a monopolistic way. I've made a pretty big discovery, which is on its way to Nature and bioRxiv in a couple of weeks, so I think it's a very fertile field compared to pure CS (where I was before). But working in Life Sciences is also a much worse experience due to the big amount of politics and naivety your article discusses so well. So I have serious doubts as to whether I should continue my career in academia, despite great offers, pursue my ideas in a startup, or generate some patents and move back to CS.