3 ms·
> Beef production is 100% efficient at producing beef. Milk production is 100% efficient at producing milk. Alright, I think there is little point in continuin
by shlant 7y ago
> Beef production is 100% efficient at producing beef. Milk production is 100% efficient at producing milk.
Alright, I think there is little point in continuing this discussion. You don't seem to understand what "efficient" means and have weak, unrelated, unsubstantiated retorts for everything. I'm sure you'll always argue that beef isn't that bad/"is efficient for what it is" regardless of the reality (which is saying a lot considering beef is the worst of all the meats).
You are free to eat what you want, but at least own up to the reality of your food choices.
- gridlockd 7y ago"You have weak arguments" isn't much of an argument either, you know. I'm well aware of what "efficient" means. I do not disagree that shoving raw plant material down people's throats is an extremely efficient way to feed them. A slightly less efficient way would be to prepare that plant material into something more palatable. Livestock is far less efficient still, and at the other end of that "efficiency spectrum" you have something like Kobe Beef. Yet, if I was to argue that we should all be eating cheap US beef instead of expensive Kobe beef because that is more efficient, it would be an obviously silly argument. Both products just don't play in the same league. > beef is the worst of all the meats In what sense? Environmentally? Perhaps. Nutritionally? Absolutely not.