4 ms·
You'd prefer that Mozilla could install any extension they want? You do realize that sets precedent that they're free to sell forced extension installs that run
by sieabahlpark 7y ago
You'd prefer that Mozilla could install any extension they want? You do realize that sets precedent that they're free to sell forced extension installs that run universally on every page?
Give an inch, take a mile. It's always like that every time by every single company in existence.
- onyva 7y agoYou sound like a Fox News host spewing talking points. Mozilla has a proven track record and a purpose, which is users rights online. Stupid or bad decisions will be made. It’s to be expected. This though doesn’t negate and change anything about my trust in them. Definitely not when compared with the likes of Brave with its tiresome PR. I suggest renaming brave AdBuddy.
- Chris_Chambers 7y agoBased on your non sequitur bleating about Fox News we can now confirm beyond any doubt whatsoever that you definitely don’t actually have a problem with Brave but rather you just hate its conservative creator Brandon Eich and in a blind rage you are stapling together barely coherent sentences to try to hurt him somehow.
- kipqi 7y agoSending the full history to an ad company by default is not a "stupid or bad decision". It goes well beyond that.
- sieabahlpark 7y agoThat along with automatically installing anything that you didn't approve. That's malware.