Fine, but it seems reasonable for someone to check. It's much easier to make a decision about whether a programming language is what you want if you've got evid

Fine, but it seems reasonable for someone to check. It's much easier to make a decision about whether a programming language is what you want if you've got evidence from someone who has tried something similar to you, as opposed to just hearing people say "Language X is awesome because of unimaginably low-level (from my point of view) feature Y". Rust seems great, to be honest, just not universally so. Nothing wrong with defining the boundaries.