Certainly distri isn’t suitable for all environments, but I think the general concept can be very resource-efficient. A few thoughts inline: > Sometimes you w

Certainly distri isn’t suitable for all environments, but I think the general concept can be very resource-efficient. A few thoughts inline: > Sometimes you want a single filesystem, sometimes you want multiple filesystems distri presents packages in a single file system (mounted at /ro). The fact that there are many images underneath remains an implementation detail to the user. > sometimes you don't have the resources to even load something like FUSE. I suppose in those environments you just can’t have package management, then, given how light-weight FUSE is. > We can already swap bootloaders, kernels, desktop environments, transplant storage from one system to another and continue working. It should be just a feasible to switch filesystem/package models. Supporting more than one packaging model seems like an enormous task to me. I think distributions are better off not blowing up their test matrix like that :)