3 ms·
Immediately before that in the article: >My clients, all aged 18-22, had answered deceptive bikini-model ads and had become embroiled in a conspiracy to perfor
by bobbiechen 7y ago
Immediately before that in the article:
>My clients, all aged 18-22, had answered deceptive bikini-model ads and had become embroiled in a conspiracy to perform porn that resulted in some of them being raped before and during the shoots.
Should victims have to take responsibility for the impact of the crimes committed against them? And in any scenario, I think the article brings up a good point:
>But even if we do something “negative,” to use Lieu’s term, should that mean we deserve to be connected to it for the rest of our lives?
The Internet makes it possible for descriptions of your past, truthful or not, to follow you forever. The idea of a "right to be forgotten" tries to balance against this.
- blunte 7y agoAt some point, hopefully, people accept that people (themselves and others) are human. Being human involves trying things, trying to make a living, exploring things, and... even sexual things. There are some fairly generally accepted limits regarding sexuality (and age of "participants", as well as consent). But humanly speaking, there is no doubt that we all have bodies with various parts, and most people get some pleasure from contact on those parts. Shaming people for doing so is like shaming someone for eating food.
- xiphias2 7y agoThis doesn't look like revenge porn to me. Revenge porn is when an ex-boyfriend shares a video of the couple having sex. This is real porn, and maybe the victim wasn't payed (in which case she should be).