Again, two different things - ending an existence, versus there being no existence to begin with. Conflating the two makes one argue ethics from a realm of inf

Again, two different things - ending an existence, versus there being no existence to begin with. Conflating the two makes one argue ethics from a realm of infinite possibilities instead of focusing on reality, which doesn't really make for great moral choices. For instance, should people have as much unprotected sex as possible, without any regard to their or their offspring's well-being, just to give the most children the chance to exist?