3 ms·

>it should be explained with facts, and clear simple language. since it looks like you've spent some time on this, would you care to take a shot?

• mola 7y ago
  What makes you think I understand this? my comment originated from the opaque language which read more like works of satire than actual analysis. All I can tell is that the whole way this company and its investors are acting is bat shit crazy. I'd like to get better analysis that is less "entertainment" and more factual and analytical.
  • ramraj07 7y ago
    It's actually just satire with numbers. Which seems better than satire by itself by a mile, and (personally) also better than rote numbers listed because it's amusing. Why complain?
  • logicallee 7y ago
    >What makes you think I understand this? The fact that you stated "The company is a fraud", before saying that this should be stated plainly. Since you didn't say something like "...from my point of view I certainly have the impression that..." or something like that. Since you spoke definitively, I assumed you have a definite opinion you formed somehow.