2 ms·
edit: Got confused by the title not actually matching the article title and having click-bait information added to it that didn't appear in the original.
by marcinzm 7y ago
edit: Got confused by the title not actually matching the article title and having click-bait information added to it that didn't appear in the original.
- detaro 7y agoWhich part of the article(!) suggests to you they didn't have that discussion?
- marcinzm 7y agoThe word tricked.
- detaro 7y agoWhere in the article does it appear? From what I see, the only claim in that direction is the random(?) headline the submitter added here. And even then, it doesn't have to be interpreted that way - it could also apply to "they'd normally not consider a language like this, but for this specific case it seemed to make sense".
- marcinzm 7y agoGood point, didn't realize they changed the original title since that's almost almost frowned upon on HN.
- ehnto 7y agoIt's definitely something that should be justified in a PR. Introducing a new tool, it's dependencies, maintenance, knowledge and training requirements is something that should be agreed upon by the team. For agencies especially, tooling is a strategic business decision.