3 ms·
> That way the work can be peer reviewed and the Scientific community has a chance to learn from it. After trawling through so much peer reviewed work which in
by bem94 7y ago
> That way the work can be peer reviewed and the Scientific community has a chance to learn from it.
After trawling through so much peer reviewed work which in their view is utterly broken, I can understand why they'd be despondent/mistrustful of submitting it to a peer review process.
- bArray 7y agoIf you want to go that route, why not write a detailed blog post? Or a white paper in an archive? Or a GitHub repository? Not putting anything out there seems awfully unproductive.