4 ms·

USA would be very smart to buy land, problem is that there are no sellers. History has proven that buying is worth it. Example: USA is running almost a $1 TRIL

USA would be very smart to buy land, problem is that there are no sellers. History has proven that buying is worth it. Example: USA is running almost a $1 TRILLION deficit. Make it two and "buy" Greenland. No rational person one would complain and Denmark /Greenlanders could set up a special fund ala Norway with the money https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Pension_Fund_of_Norway https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Pension_Fund_of_Nor...

zeristor 7y ago
Greenland isn’t for sale, but China has been reported to be trying to charm the Greenlanders to join China. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46386867 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46386867 Hong Kong on ice?
- onetimemanytime 7y ago
  Not gonna happen. Doesn't Denmark ultimately have e veto power (National Security at least) over major issues in Greenland? Buying is a loaded word. How about joining USA ? Then USA can duke it with Russia in the Artic game. Or USA can crunch some numbers...might be cheaper to invade Canada. Fifth time is the charm as they say. Joking OK...maybe ;)
  - netsharc 7y ago
    If only there was another way to get countries to do what "we" want, but nicely, because it would be mutually beneficial. We could call it "soft power".
- ashishmalik 7y ago
  Why China always try to capture the area of other country?
  - inflatableDodo 7y ago
    Historically, it really isn't one of the worst offenders.
    - Mountain_Skies 7y ago
      While certainly influenced by it, we don't live in the past, we live in the present. There was a time when one could say that the British weren't one of the worst offenders when it came to expansion. But then they were. China's expansionism might be new but that doesn't make it less of an issue.
Tinfoilhat666 7y ago
The better option is that Denmark buys USA. They could make it a great country. Really, Danish are open for that: https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/denmark-offers-to-buy-us https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/denmark-offe...
- okusername 7y ago
  That's not real, it's meant to be "satire".
- chr1 7y ago
  If they don't include anti-democratic clauses in the contract the result will be exactly the same as if USA bought Denmark, that is Denmark will become a small state in USA.
KozmoNau7 7y ago
>"No rational person one would complain" One does not simply sell a nation and a people. The colonial days are over.
- onetimemanytime 7y ago
  No one is buying or selling people, at least not as slaves or for soap. However a territory has a value and a country can be compensated for it, assuming people at all levels agree to it. Greenlanders would be Americans as suppose to "Danish"

zeristor 7y ago

Greenland isn’t for sale, but China has been reported to be trying to charm the Greenlanders to join China. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46386867 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46386867 Hong Kong on ice?

onetimemanytime 7y ago
Not gonna happen. Doesn't Denmark ultimately have e veto power (National Security at least) over major issues in Greenland? Buying is a loaded word. How about joining USA ? Then USA can duke it with Russia in the Artic game. Or USA can crunch some numbers...might be cheaper to invade Canada. Fifth time is the charm as they say. Joking OK...maybe ;)
- netsharc 7y ago
  If only there was another way to get countries to do what "we" want, but nicely, because it would be mutually beneficial. We could call it "soft power".
ashishmalik 7y ago
Why China always try to capture the area of other country?
- inflatableDodo 7y ago
  Historically, it really isn't one of the worst offenders.
  - Mountain_Skies 7y ago
    While certainly influenced by it, we don't live in the past, we live in the present. There was a time when one could say that the British weren't one of the worst offenders when it came to expansion. But then they were. China's expansionism might be new but that doesn't make it less of an issue.

Tinfoilhat666 7y ago

The better option is that Denmark buys USA. They could make it a great country. Really, Danish are open for that: https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/denmark-offers-to-buy-us https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/denmark-offe...

okusername 7y ago
That's not real, it's meant to be "satire".
chr1 7y ago
If they don't include anti-democratic clauses in the contract the result will be exactly the same as if USA bought Denmark, that is Denmark will become a small state in USA.

KozmoNau7 7y ago

>"No rational person one would complain" One does not simply sell a nation and a people. The colonial days are over.

onetimemanytime 7y ago
No one is buying or selling people, at least not as slaves or for soap. However a territory has a value and a country can be compensated for it, assuming people at all levels agree to it. Greenlanders would be Americans as suppose to "Danish"