4 ms·
I agree, the one thing we could and probably should change is the diversity of crops we subsidize. We want food stability, but we don't need to base that stabil
by AngryData 7y ago
I agree, the one thing we could and probably should change is the diversity of crops we subsidize. We want food stability, but we don't need to base that stability on pure corn syrup.
- plankers 7y agoNot to mention crop monoculture is terrible for the quality of the soil, forcing farmers to use (literally) tons of synthetic phosphorous, nitrogen, and potassium just to get acceptable yields. It results in lower quality crops than those that result from polyculture, as well. A comment in the top thread mentioned The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan as a good introduction to this issue and I'll second that. A fun read, too. He investigates hunting and amateur mycology as well.
- numakerg 7y agoHow do the costs of managing a multiculture field compare to a monoculture one? I'd imagine the planting, maintenance and harvesting procedures benefit significantly from the crop being a single type.
- GordonS 7y agoI guess you're right, but only for so long - different crops add and remove different nutrients from the soil, so if you keep planting the same thing you will eventually deplete the soil of the nutrients to grow that crop.