3 ms·
Economic growth is not "for the sake of growth;" it's for the sake of wealth.
by all_blue_chucks 7y ago
Economic growth is not "for the sake of growth;" it's for the sake of wealth.
- darkerside 7y agoWhat do you think wealth means
- Robotbeat 7y agoQuality of life and human agency.
- ggm 7y agoCurrent economic wealth is implicitly dependent on asymmetric relationships! It's not win win by design. Without the assymetrical relationship wealth doesn't exist. The other one is predicated in equity but if we talk about it a bunch of suck holes go full Ayn Rand on things.