4 ms·
> I don't blame Google at all. I blame the behavior of the OP and his lack of effort to communicate with his peers in a mature, healthy, and positive way. What
by linuxftw 7y ago
> I don't blame Google at all. I blame the behavior of the OP and his lack of effort to communicate with his peers in a mature, healthy, and positive way.
What's mature, healthy, and positive? Maybe it's society that is the failure? Maybe the unending docility of modern life is creating emotional volcanoes. Maybe some people like hostility, and maybe some people like confrontation. Not everyone and everything needs to be 'nice'; this is an ideal that needs to die.
- mrburton 7y ago> Maybe it's society that is the failure? That implies you have no self-control and require the government to tell you how to think/behave. > Not everyone and everything needs to be 'nice'; this is an ideal that needs to die. Who said people need to be nice? I recall me saying: > communicate with his peers in a mature, healthy, and positive way.
- linuxftw 7y ago> That implies you have no self-control and require the government to tell you how to think/behave. I don't see how that implies a lack of self control, and I'm not sure what the government has to do with it. > Who said people need to be nice? I recall me saying: I guess I read 'positive' as 'be nice.' What's a positive way to deal with a world that you hate (hypothetically)? Why should anyone do anything positive, why can't they lash out as they see fit? Why should someone live by rules that others created without their consent, and then be 'positive' about it? Maybe society has failed. Maybe we're not living how we're supposed to be living.
- mrburton 7y agoWhat does 'failure' mean then? ;)