3 ms·
TLDR, no results, no code, no details, just admission of failure from anonymous redditor with SEO link on his unrelated crypto-trading project.
by riku_iki 7y ago
TLDR, no results, no code, no details, just admission of failure from anonymous redditor with SEO link on his unrelated crypto-trading project.
- dvt 7y agoWhy is this getting downvoted? The original post is clearly marketing clickbait. It's trivially true that most "predict the stock market" papers are going to be bunk.
- mxcrossb 7y agoIt’s baffling to me that anyone would believe this post. Do people here not have an ounce of skepticism?
- javert 7y agoI think people aren't skeptical about this because it lines up with what they already expect. That's the case for me. If the guy is lying and it's all made up, I'd still wager that if you assembled a collection of 130 papers on this topic, at most 10% would be valid [1]. So even if he's wrong, he's probably not wrong. [1] I have an academic background, and I think invalid papers make it through peer review constantly. Peer review is not what people think it is.