Totally baffled as to what you are talking about. If the land no longer has access to water and thus can't be used for farming anymore why would the government

Totally baffled as to what you are talking about. If the land no longer has access to water and thus can't be used for farming anymore why would the government pay to conserve it for future farming? The Sahara example isn't applicable because this is land that was made suitable for farming through artificial means. You also seem to think solar farms ruin the land. I explicitly talk about doing solar in such a way that would qualify for the conservation program that improves land.