4 ms·

You might want to enable JavaScript or get a modern browser.

by franck 16y ago

joe24pack 16y ago
>You might want to enable JavaScript or get a modern browser. Javascript enabled and browser is "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.12) Gecko/2009070811 Red Hat/3.0.12-1.el5_3 Firefox/3.0.12" so I should be fine. Error Console does report an interesting little tidbit; Error: color is undefined Source File: http://mothereffinghsl.com/js/script.js http://mothereffinghsl.com/js/script.js Line: 89 The function in question is function inputchange(e){ var target = e.target; if (target.id == 'alpha'){ alpha = Math.floor(target.value)/100; if (alpha === 1){ alpha = undefined; } } if (target.id == 'light'){ var split = color.split('%'); split[1] = split[1].replace(/\d+/, Math.round(target.value)); color = split.join('%'); } setText(); } Sorry I dont have a full stack trace for you, nor am I inclined to fire up a debugger right now to troubleshoot this any further. ... page is still stuck at "One sec, bro."
- paulirish 16y ago
  Firefox 3.0 is 2.5 years old, bro. "Mozilla ended support for Firefox 3 on March 30, 2010 with the release of 3.0.19" which is 7 security updates after what you're carrying around. I'm not the only one who doesn't test it anymore.
  - joe24pack 16y ago
    Then there is a real simple solution for you, don't claim that your site is compatible with Firefox 3.0 + ... because it clearly is not. Say what you do, do what you say.
  - Xuzz 16y ago
    However, I see it around as an alternative to IE -- usually IE6.
- magicalist 16y ago
  seriously? http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.19 http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefo... I wouldn't be so sure about being fine.
  - joe24pack 16y ago
    In the context of this thread and the given subject matter, that the linked page supports Firefox 3.0+, the browser I was browsing with at that time should have been able to render and execute the page correctly according to what the author of the page claims. I did not say a word about that browser being vulnerable to any given browser exploits.
    - magicalist 16y ago
      well that was kind of the structure of the joke: juxtaposing a different meaning of the words you wrote with information on browser vulnerabilities. I don't see a statement about browser support on the site or on the submission, but maybe you're referring to the linked blog post? The blog post lists Firefox 3.0+ as a browser that supports hsla, not browser support for the color picker site.
      - joe24pack 16y ago
        mea culpa, I didn't read that blog post closely enough

You might want to enable JavaScript or get a modern browser.

by franck 16y ago

You might want to enable JavaScript or get a modern browser.

>You might want to enable JavaScript or get a modern browser. Javascript enabled and browser is "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.12) Gecko/2009070811 Red Hat/3.0.12-1.el5_3 Firefox/3.0.12" so I should be fine. Error Console does report an interesting little tidbit; Error: color is undefined Source File: http://mothereffinghsl.com/js/script.js http://mothereffinghsl.com/js/script.js Line: 89 The function in question is function inputchange(e){ var target = e.target; if (target.id == 'alpha'){ alpha = Math.floor(target.value)/100; if (alpha === 1){ alpha = undefined; } } if (target.id == 'light'){ var split = color.split('%'); split[1] = split[1].replace(/\d+/, Math.round(target.value)); color = split.join('%'); } setText(); } Sorry I dont have a full stack trace for you, nor am I inclined to fire up a debugger right now to troubleshoot this any further. ... page is still stuck at "One sec, bro."

paulirish 16y ago
Firefox 3.0 is 2.5 years old, bro. "Mozilla ended support for Firefox 3 on March 30, 2010 with the release of 3.0.19" which is 7 security updates after what you're carrying around. I'm not the only one who doesn't test it anymore.
- joe24pack 16y ago
  Then there is a real simple solution for you, don't claim that your site is compatible with Firefox 3.0 + ... because it clearly is not. Say what you do, do what you say.
- Xuzz 16y ago
  However, I see it around as an alternative to IE -- usually IE6.
magicalist 16y ago
seriously? http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox30.html#firefox3.0.19 http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefo... I wouldn't be so sure about being fine.
- joe24pack 16y ago
  In the context of this thread and the given subject matter, that the linked page supports Firefox 3.0+, the browser I was browsing with at that time should have been able to render and execute the page correctly according to what the author of the page claims. I did not say a word about that browser being vulnerable to any given browser exploits.
  - magicalist 16y ago
    well that was kind of the structure of the joke: juxtaposing a different meaning of the words you wrote with information on browser vulnerabilities. I don't see a statement about browser support on the site or on the submission, but maybe you're referring to the linked blog post? The blog post lists Firefox 3.0+ as a browser that supports hsla, not browser support for the color picker site.
    - joe24pack 16y ago
      mea culpa, I didn't read that blog post closely enough