> Potential injuries include burns, puncture wounds and welts yet > repeatedly do this without long-lasting identifiable physical traces, makes them a favoure

> Potential injuries include burns, puncture wounds and welts yet > repeatedly do this without long-lasting identifiable physical traces, makes them a favoured tool of torture if i understand this correctly it seems that the risks are either pretty low or the artifacts don't last very long. anyway, is the mechanism similar to e.g. Taser? if so seems much ado about nothing here, American cops have been getting off on using those for decades