> Even though the constitution still describes > the value of a dollar as a specific weight of > gold, like most other things in that document > it is ign

> Even though the constitution still describes > the value of a dollar as a specific weight of > gold, like most other things in that document > it is ignored. Citation needed. Article 1, Section 10 is the only place I can recall saying anything about gold: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. _My_ reading opens up a door for "Texas Bucks" issued with backing/redemption of some volume of gold/silver. But I'll wait on expounding more to give you the opportunity to show me where I am mistaken.