3 ms·
So? I’m not talking about “industrialized nations”. I’m talking about you, personally. If you elect to have one fewer child, you can drive a car everywhere and
by irq11 7y ago
So? I’m not talking about “industrialized nations”. I’m talking about you, personally.
If you elect to have one fewer child, you can drive a car everywhere and fly first class for vacation and eat a big steak every week of your life, and you’ll still be greener than your neighbor with the solar panels and the Tesla. Doesn’t matter what birth rates are in the industrialized world.
- edmundsauto 7y agoAnother way of saying it is that you believe by not having kids, you can ethically consume the energy that your offspring (and their offspring) would have consumed.
- irq11 7y agoNo, not at all. I don’t believe that; the point is that the magnitude of the impact is so dramatically greater that all of this other stuff is rounding error. Drive a Tesla and put solar panels on your house and eat vegan and shop local at the co-op. Knock yourself out. But the single guy next door with no kids who drives a muscle car and eats big red steaks every day is still doing more for global warming than you are. It’s not even a question.