I'm not referring to "gaming the system", I'm referring to the refusal to hand over appeals to an independent third party, or in some cases flatly refusing appe

I'm not referring to "gaming the system", I'm referring to the refusal to hand over appeals to an independent third party, or in some cases flatly refusing appeals. The contentid, moderation and banning decisions should be subject to public scrutiny, they shouldn't be the unassailable result of a backroom process. it sounds like you believe removing videos that are not illegal in and of themselves is itself illegal. It's not even on my radar. I'm concerned with the transparency and consistency of the process, not the outcome of individual decisions.