3 ms·
Why not both? At least in terms of priority, the damage is done and is already in the atmosphere. imo, we need to first focus on cleaning that up and getting s
by JimiofEden 7y ago
Why not both?
At least in terms of priority, the damage is done and is already in the atmosphere. imo, we need to first focus on cleaning that up and getting some form of homeostasis before it gets much worse, WHILE working on solar/nuclear/renewable tech to make sure we don't just relapse and make the problem worse again.
I'm optimistically hoping that's the route we'd take anyways. Money tends to say otherwise tho. =(