Further food for thought: the lower the statistical power of a study which meets a given significance threshold, the more exaggerated the effect size will be.

Further food for thought: the lower the statistical power of a study which meets a given significance threshold, the more exaggerated the effect size will be. So our default posture to evidence like this, even assuming we find it broadly credible, should be that the real-world effect is very likely to be smaller than this, and very unlikely to be larger.