Fact checkers and scientists already exist, but in a democracy, the people have the right to choose whether to listen to them or not. Are you saying you'd pref

Fact checkers and scientists already exist, but in a democracy, the people have the right to choose whether to listen to them or not. Are you saying you'd prefer that people be forced to follow their decisions? Or that information they declare "incorrect" be banned? That's not democratic, that's authoritarian.