3 ms·
The numbers are somewhat contested. See potholer54's well-sourced video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwMPFDqyfrA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwMPFDqyfrA
by bjourne 7y ago
The numbers are somewhat contested. See potholer54's well-sourced video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwMPFDqyfrA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwMPFDqyfrA He cites ghg savings of about 20-30% for a common mix of electricity production sources.
Of course, Jussi Pasanen is still completely right. The only solution is to stop driving cars.
- phtrivier 7y agoFine. Which rural neighborhood do we nuke first ? Big cities can definitely phase cars put, and should electrify their public transportations for the people who can't bike. Some form of "small number of passengers, not short but not long range" trips are going to have to be done ouside of cities, unless you displace people. If "displacing people to cities" is your advocated policy, or "preventing people from traveling at all", that's a legitimate point to argue, but be prepared for fierce resistance from well meaning people (who're not going to massively vote for you...)