3 ms·

No, it's not enough. He made a few very specific and strong statements that need to be backed up with something.

• mcv 7y ago
  It's a memo, not a lawsuit. He's describing a harmful culture, not naming specific names. He doesn't have to name specific slurs that were used. I would really like to believe that you're smart enough to understand what some of those slurs could have been. Which exactly were used has no relevance to the message of the memo.
  • joe223 7y ago
    Without details this memo isn't credible. Just like he doesn't have to mention any details, we don't have to believe him.
    • mcv 7y ago
      Do you work at Google? People at the company may well recognise the situation. Whether or not you believe it is relatively irrelevant. Anyone with any social awareness will recognise this as something that certainly could happen. And people who are set to disbelieve it no matter what, will not be swayed by evidence anyway, like creationists and flat earthers.