Agreed that link was not perfect hence the qualifying statement. You found great links/data that allow you to ask the question of cows vs human methane producti

Agreed that link was not perfect hence the qualifying statement. You found great links/data that allow you to ask the question of cows vs human methane production. If you came across with that first, I think this would be different. If my statement came across as dismissive of discussion, it was because I felt you were not willing to provide to the discussion. Your opening statement "Is this event relevant anymore?" is a dismissive one. My "attitude" reply is a response to that dismissive opening statement. You may disagree with me on my interpretation, but I don't have enough karma to downvote. I am much more willing to discuss that now. What is the amount of the other 45% is cow methane? Is it a non-trivial amount?