FWIW, I understand the problem quite well. misterdoubt was drawing a distinction between a journal, i.e. the publication itself, and it's constituent papers &

FWIW, I understand the problem quite well. misterdoubt was drawing a distinction between a journal, i.e. the publication itself, and it's constituent papers & researchers. You are simply denying that distinction, which isn't an effective refutation of their idea. To me it seems you are being intentionally obtuse here, so I'll leave it at that.