3 ms·
> Why is Apple entitled to security research at anything less than the current market rate? This is not only about Apple. This is also about their customers. Y
by outworlder 7y ago
> Why is Apple entitled to security research at anything less than the current market rate?
This is not only about Apple. This is also about their customers. You are essentially advocating that people should sell exploits in the black market, legal disclosure be damned.
- ekc 7y agoThat is what freedom of speech implies, yes.
- mlindner 7y agoThere's a strong difference between being in favor of the _right_ of freedom of speech but against specific instances of speech. They are completely different. I'm in favor of their right to go to the black market, but I'm completely against them actually going to the black market.
- alasdair_ 7y agoThis reminds me of the “DeCSS” case, where claims were made that a specific number was not allowed to be spoken or transmitted or otherwise shared. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeCSS ) Obviously the DeCSS people lost that argument. Banning someone from saying “by doing X you can bypass security feature Y” is going to be a difficult one to get past the Supreme Court, at least in the USA.
- FireBeyond 7y agoSo if they have a right to go to the black market, then Apple has no case. Or rather Corellium might have a case against Apple for tortious interference.
- nguoi 7y agoTotal freedom of speech would imply that you're allowed to make movies about cartoon mice and publish information about military designs. No country has total freedom.
- alasdair_ 7y agoSubstitute “exploit” for “speech about security” and you will see that doing so is explicitly protected under US law.