4 ms·
Looks like it was more than that (plus he's now trying to claim he owns a part of the company and/or entitled to $2MM.. again, according to the doc) "[redacted
by vitalychernobyl 7y ago
Looks like it was more than that (plus he's now trying to claim he owns a part of the company and/or entitled to $2MM.. again, according to the doc)
"[redacted]'s at-will employment was
terminated for the reasons herein explained, and [redacted] left Toptal’s employ unjustly
enriched, and with amounts owed by him to Toptal in the form of unpaid loan amounts,
unreimbursed credit card charges of a purely personal nature, and restitution for amounts caused
to be embezzled and diverted to his girlfriend and for an unapproved, self-awarded bonus, totaling
at least $629,850.46."
- bruceb 7y agoThanks. I just read first the few pages, thought it was lower. If the COO just kept quiet, I think it would have been worth it to forget even $630k, but I guess could say it also sends a message. I don't think most people on HN knew about the interesting events related to ownership of Toptal, so good for us the suit happened.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- elsewhen 7y agofrom the lawsuit: "47. On July 3, 2019, [redacted] wired $466,373.67 to Toptal." so, this whole lawsuit seems to be about: $163,476.79
- vitalychernobyl 7y agoYeah - they said that.. but then they had the whole $629k+ in the actual ask in the suit.. there is either more in addition, or they don't "accept" the pay-back (or just trying to make it look bigger to benefit the case)