>What if the evidence is deemed offensive by a mob because they don’t like the scientific findings? This is pretty much the history of science. It is full of

>What if the evidence is deemed offensive by a mob because they don’t like the scientific findings? This is pretty much the history of science. It is full of instances where new findings were rejected by society at large. I get the impression that you're trying to make some point about the environment today, but pushing against societal inertia is pretty much built into the idea of doing science. it's always been that way, and will continue to be that way until people are basically willing to put their ego on hold and consider something without judgement.