3 ms·
I don't really like arguing analogies. I'm not convinced that a take home + code review is easily gamed.
by staticassertion 7y ago
I don't really like arguing analogies. I'm not convinced that a take home + code review is easily gamed.
- WalterBright 7y agoI've seen it happen often enough to know. It's not that hard - just read the code you copied until you understand how it works.
- staticassertion 7y agoIf they understand how it works well enough to go through a code review and modify it based on that code review, what's the problem? That just... sounds like what your work is going to be.
- WalterBright 7y ago> what's the problem? Good question. Like I said elsewhere in this thread, there are many people who are knowledgeable and intelligent about coding, but cannot code. They are different skills. I've met many people like this. I could study Romeo+Juliet and know everything about it that lit professors know. But I could never write it. For another example, from my time at Boeing, the engineers were divided into two independent groups. One group designed, the other group analyzed and checked the designs. They were different skills, and the engineers would gravitate to whichever path best suited them.
- staticassertion 7y agoMy point is more that if they can do all of those things and "game" the interview they seem like a good hire.