That is a ridiculous premise for a lawsuit. The complaint acknowledges that, as it states in the iOS security guide, iCloud users' data is encrypted before bei

That is a ridiculous premise for a lawsuit. The complaint acknowledges that, as it states in the iOS security guide, iCloud users' data is encrypted before being stored with third-party services. While that may address some of the privacy concerns related to third-party storage practices, the complaint says it "does nothing to address other fundamental concerns about the integrity of the data, reliability of the storage, and assurance that the data stored will remain intact and accessible by the user on demand without being damaged, lost, stolen, or otherwise disposed of by third-party entities." Integrity, reliability, and assurance? Apple promises none of those. "Apple does not guarantee or warrant that any Content you may store or access through the Service will not be subject to inadvertent damage, corruption or loss." "APPLE DOES NOT REPRESENT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE SERVICE WILL BE FREE FROM LOSS, CORRUPTION, ATTACK, VIRUSES, INTERFERENCE, HACKING, OR OTHER SECURITY INTRUSION, AND APPLE DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY RELATING THERETO." Availability? Nope. "APPLE... MAKE[S] NO WARRANTY THAT (I) THE SERVICE WILL MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS; (II) YOUR USE OF THE SERVICE WILL BE TIMELY, UNINTERRUPTED, SECURE OR ERROR-FREE" Do these nuisance lawsuits really earn any money?