3 ms·
Which study would that be? This one [1] concludes “both the “ideological sorting” and “vote-buying” hypotheses are able to explain the positive correlations ob
by simplecomplex 7y ago
Which study would that be? This one [1] concludes “both the “ideological sorting” and “vote-buying” hypotheses are able to explain the positive correlations observed between PAC contributions and voting behavior.”
In other words, vote buying is not necessarily why votes correlate with contributions along policy lines.
Fact: You can be a CEO.
Fact: You can be elected to vote on laws.
Fact: There is no financial or divine right requirement to run for office or be a CEO.
[1] https://www.ifs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Bronars-1997-Money-And-Votes.pdf https://www.ifs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Bronars-1997-...
- dv_dt 7y agohttps://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-echochambers-27074746 "Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organised groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence." And have you seen any discussion of who exactly ends up as CEO of say fortune 500 companies. There is a distinct lack of women, and of the women who are represented there is a slant to those with wealthy family backgrounds.
- simplecomplex 7y agoThere is no gender or financial requirement to be a CEO. Everyone can be a CEO. Here’s some job ads for CEO: https://www.indeed.com/m/jobs?q=CEO https://www.indeed.com/m/jobs?q=CEO You’ll notice there’s nothing about gender in any of them, or being born to wealthy parents. Consider that maybe the limiting factor to becoming a CEO is yourself, and not society, men, rich people, discrimination, etc.