3 ms·
I'm pretty sure this is a bizarre twist where it's a founder getting screwed over with no stock, vs a "regular" non-executive.
by jusben1369 7y ago
I'm pretty sure this is a bizarre twist where it's a founder getting screwed over with no stock, vs a "regular" non-executive.
- frakkingcylons 7y agoIt's an unfortunate mix of both, according to The Information. A co-founder, early investors, and employees aren't receiving stock because their contracts were dependent on future fund raises (which never emerged).