3 ms·
I love stuff like this. This is like the 5th or 6th time I've seen 3D techniques from the past become real time relevant. The first one I saw was from the 50'
by edoo 7y ago
I love stuff like this. This is like the 5th or 6th time I've seen 3D techniques from the past become real time relevant. The first one I saw was from the 50's and someone just happened to explore it and it happened to run great on modern hardware. I bet there is a ton of stuff out there like this. I do wish there was more of a benchmarking standard. It is great that it now runs in 20ms on his laptop but that says nothing about the actual computational requirements.
- mourner 7y agoEveryone's hardware is different, so I've included notes about computational complexity of the algorithm in the notebook too.