4 ms·
It's not impossible, but I'm not sure a one-price-fits-all makes the most sense. Let's say I travel mostly in the mid-west. I go to lots of co-working spaces
by big_chungus 7y ago
It's not impossible, but I'm not sure a one-price-fits-all makes the most sense. Let's say I travel mostly in the mid-west. I go to lots of co-working spaces for my three-hundred-per-month. You, mean while, live in new england. You travel to lots of spaces, too. Here's the difference: it is significantly more expensive to operate a space in new england. Food is pricier, land is much pricier, the list goes on. For a unified price, I would 1. have to charge mid-westerners more and coastal customers less, and 2. Lose some money from mid-wester customers which could have been made from them.
Better price discrimination -> better profits; businesses seek to do this every day with tiers, regional pricing, etc. Why would I throw all this away?
- votepaunchy 7y agoGyms solved this problem with pricing tiers. Silver, gold, platinum, etc. You can only visit locations at or below your membership level.
- SeeDave 7y agoThat is a far more reputable industry than timeshares ;) I would propose Silver, Gold, Platinum plus optional drop-in rates of $x day, $x4 for a week, $x15 for a month such that $Gold - $Silver = $x*15