2 ms·

The reason I think this is not good is that CEOs are out of touch with what losing a job would feel like to most of their employees. They can afford to take ris

The reason I think this is not good is that CEOs are out of touch with what losing a job would feel like to most of their employees. They can afford to take risks or just become complacent. What happens, though, is that employees lose their jobs and struggle because we all know that's the first tool in the CEO belt; cut jobs. I think if wages weren't so inflated companies might be better run because even the CEO has skin in the game.

ryanmercer 7y ago
>The reason I think this is not good is that CEOs are out of touch with what losing a job would feel like to most of their employees. A million times this. My CEO took 16.6 million in compensation last year, I can retire 20-24x with that (if it were net not gross, hard telling how much in taxes he paid)