I absolutely agree that it is relevant to the discussion but not where/how the author introduced it. The image is just distracting and confusing without any sor

I absolutely agree that it is relevant to the discussion but not where/how the author introduced it. The image is just distracting and confusing without any sort of commentary. The author even plainly states that they don't understand it in the caption: > This is the planned structure for The We Company after its IPO, as it appears in its S-1 form. I’d try to explain it, but I don’t understand what the fuck is happening. If you don't get it but you want readers to be aware of it then either just link to it or put it at the end after you have made your argument. Don't place it at the beginning before you have even fully explained the premise of the article.