4 ms·
Exfiltrating surveillance data probably falls foul of some law as well, that's not the point. People who remove antennae from their devices are doing so becaus
by esotericn 7y ago
Exfiltrating surveillance data probably falls foul of some law as well, that's not the point.
People who remove antennae from their devices are doing so because the law is cold comfort after the fact. This is like telling a farmer they don't need guns because 911 will be there quickly enough. Nope.
It also seems unlikely that connecting to an unsecured access point can be said to be "unauthorized access". That would make like, free wifi essentially anywhere (hotels, fast food places, airports, coffee shops, libraries) illegal to access unless you like, asked someone first. It's in direct contrast with how probably 99% of people use WiFi.
- saagarjha 7y agoYou agree to terms before connecting to free Wi-Fi.
- esotericn 7y agoEr, no you don't? You don't even know what the terms are. Maybe you're talking about captive portals. Not all free wifi even has terms.
- saagarjha 7y agoWell then you're violating the CFAA. You're a horrible person who deserves to go to jail for what you did. (I never said I agreed with the how the CFAA is written…)
- liability 7y agoUninformed consent makes a mockery of the very concept of consent. Anybody suggesting otherwise should be ashamed with themselves.
- saagarjha 7y agoYou must be talking about someone else, then, since I'm certainly not suggesting otherwise.