3 ms·
Precisely. We're even psychologically inclined to agree with RO because "it" is "fighting the good fight" and "fighting The Man", etc. Whether she's legitimatel
by inanutshellus 7y ago
Precisely. We're even psychologically inclined to agree with RO because "it" is "fighting the good fight" and "fighting The Man", etc. Whether she's legitimately exactly who she says she is or "it" is just a next-level PR AI whose sole purpose is harming Amazon, we have little way of knowing, especially outside this specific example.
- pjc50 7y agoOn the other hand, this obfuscatory conversation and the allegation that random individual accounts are paid anti-corporate is one that adds to the weight for "inanutshellus may be an Amazon shill account, or at least employee"
- enkiv2 7y agoYeah, if this makes front page the odds are nearly 100% that paid amazon shills will fill the comments -- and odds are greater than 50% that it already has been.
- twic 7y agoI'm a paid anti-corporate shill, and so is my wife!
- inanutshellus 7y agoA clever redirect, @rulesObeyer!
- mentalpiracy 7y ago"legitimately exactly who she says she is" as if the timeline of her twitter account didn't lend to her identity. Especially in contrast to the Amazon FC accounts which are brand new and follow 0 other twitter users.
- hleach 7y agoI am kind of shocked at the conversation above simply because of how evidently right you are. Does she have an agenda? Yes clearly. She isn't hiding it. She has a long history of laying it right out in the open. Does Amazon have an agenda too? Yes and they are ham-handedly trying to pretend they don't.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- Sean1708 7y agoWe're inclined to agree with RO because her account looks genuine, whereas the Amazon accounts look like this: https://mobile.twitter.com/TheKenChilds/status/1161847717397696512 https://mobile.twitter.com/TheKenChilds/status/1161847717397...