3 ms·
we're least aware of what our minds do best I'm not sure we are aware of anything. If you ask me: How much is 2x3? I might think: That's easy! I ju
by FreeHugs 7y ago
we're least aware of what our minds do best
I'm not sure we are aware of anything.
If you ask me:
How much is 2x3?
I might think:
That's easy! I just have to imagine 3 stones.
Then I imagine two piles of 3 stones.
Then I count all those stones. 6!
But how did I came up with that? How did I even figure out what the question is about? It's all unconscious and so far we have no clue how to program a system that grasp even these type of easy questions.
It could be a nice approach to AI to try and breed (via AI/Genetic Algorithms/Whatever) a system that can solve math questions, independent on how they are phrased.
- Sharlin 7y agoTo be fair, you have been taught what the symbols 2, x, 3, and 6 mean, and what multiplication means, and how it can be thought of as n sets of m items. 2 and 3 are small enough numbers that subitizing kicks in, which does indeed appear to be an evolved, hardcoded mechanism. But what about 7x9? Most of us have either memorized it, or have to break it down into more elementary operations, using an algorithm that has been, again, taught to us. Never mind something like 435x928. It is certainly possible to teach a machine how to reason about algebra from the first principles, allowing it to solve much, much more complex problems than multiplying small integers. The program doesn't know how it is executed, either, but it does have a much better understanding of what multiplying actually is than most humans.