5 ms·
That would sure seem to be the case unless you see from where refugees are allowed. They are not allowed from all over the world, only areas dealing with partit
by eklavya 7y ago
That would sure seem to be the case unless you see from where refugees are allowed. They are not allowed from all over the world, only areas dealing with partition or Indian history.
- iamshs 7y agoRohingya is in immediate neighbourhood, you don't have to circumnavigate the globe from Myanmar. India and Myanmar share a border.
- eklavya 7y agoI am saying again and again partition and Indian history. Nepal is also a border state. China is also a border state, uighurs aren’t included.
- iamshs 7y agoMaybe familiarise yourself with Indian geography; you see between Xinjiang and India, there is this mountain range called Himalayas. Pretty big mountains those ones. Nepal has no internal disturbances, and India-Nepal border is absolutely open allowing free flow of people.
- eklavya 7y agoYou know people can travel to different countries which are separated by mountains, oceans, deserts right? But those people won’t get citizenship unless the partition and Indian history part holds.
- selimthegrim 7y agoMy family is Ahmedi. We left India in 1947. Pakistan stripped us of our right to vote in 1974-84. I guess we can't be oppressed there, chief. Congratulations on your airtight logic.
- eklavya 7y agoI am sorry, I forgot about that. It's not feasible though, at least in the present scenario. I wish it was different.
- dang 7y ago> I guess we can't be oppressed there, chief. Congratulations on your airtight logic. Please don't snark on HN. It's against the site guidelines and degrades your serious point. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]