3 ms·
> The difference is that the wealth from cost-cutting (automation/outsourcing) isn't shared with the middle class As an engineer with equity in the company I w
by malandrew 7y ago
> The difference is that the wealth from cost-cutting (automation/outsourcing) isn't shared with the middle class
As an engineer with equity in the company I work for, I benefit and I'm middle class.
I think there is also a misconception about how much the capital holders actually gain. A lot of automation is deflationary in the sense that it reduces the cost of production, which in turn allows a reduction in the price a product is sold at to capture market share. This allows the firm that is automating to capture a large piece of that market, but at the cost of making that market a lot smaller unless demand is pretty much unbounded.
You have to both automate and grow the market for what you've automated to truly make it big.
- AstralStorm 7y agoAnd hope the market has no natural bound or is at risk of getting obsolete. Even where automation is not involved, you can get choked by lack of qualified manpower. This is already happening in the USA, stopping the brain drain from elsewhere. (Especially with the immigration policies.) Outsourcing is essentially growing external competition by your own hand.