99% is good enough? If 1% of all secure public data transmissions were compromised there would practically be no point in trying to secure anything. And who i

99% is good enough? If 1% of all secure public data transmissions were compromised there would practically be no point in trying to secure anything. And who is Barr to decide what's worth encrypting on a societal level? I'll put my photo album through 5 different algorithms if I want to. Such is my right. Go ahead Barr, make laws for corporations to follow and watch as all that data you're trying to capture disintegrate from the networks where you gave yourself access and reappears on even more secure smaller scale distributed systems. What will happen is instead of Google hosting your data for you they'll just create devices that let you store your data at home, offline while only beaming back the telemetry and meta.