5 ms·
I wonder why the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) hasn't weighed in on this whole sector at all. The exploitation of entertainers is not exactly a new issue, and it ha
by callalex 7y ago
I wonder why the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) hasn't weighed in on this whole sector at all. The exploitation of entertainers is not exactly a new issue, and it has been tackled by existing unions before.
- programmarchy 7y agoThey are probably on the other side of the issue. YouTube independent creators are in competition with Hollywood and big media.
- Dirlewanger 7y agoProbably because they're contemptuous of YouTubers. Can't blame them either, because they're basically competition.
- fucking_tragedy 7y agoSAG-AFTRA has weighed in on this issue, both to the press[1] and on their website[2]. From their site: > Do you create your own content on YouTube or other social media platforms? > If a brand reaches out to promote their product (paid or product trade) on your platform, that is a commercial and SAG-AFTRA can have your back. > SAG-AFTRA covers advertisements on all platforms. Get fair compensation, access to health insurance and a team of experts making sure you are PAID! [1] https://www.tubefilter.com/2018/08/15/sag-aftra-content-creator-protections/ https://www.tubefilter.com/2018/08/15/sag-aftra-content-crea... [2] https://www.sagaftra.org/get-involved/ads-go-union/creators-only https://www.sagaftra.org/get-involved/ads-go-union/creators-...
- anon1m0us 7y agoSo what you're saying is there already is a union for content creators, they just need to join it. That seems like a way better approach. All content creators on the internet should join the same union -- preferably one that already exists -- rather than recreate a wheel that will water down their message.
- fucking_tragedy 7y agoCompetition is a good thing, perhaps other unions can meet the needs of content creators better than this one.