3 ms·
Why? Does every compiler writer know all the theoretical underpinnings and generalizations of their work? Or do that make something that solves a problem withou
by lonelappde 7y ago
Why? Does every compiler writer know all the theoretical underpinnings and generalizations of their work? Or do that make something that solves a problem without investigating the entire universe around it?
- danharaj 7y agoBecause he was certainly aware of the literature and he was a top notch scholar. Your follow-up questions seem to be implying something, care to spell it out for me?
- phkahler 7y agoBut was he top notch back then? He's most well known for "creating" Lisp. And I put that in quotes because he never meant for anyone to implement it on a real machine.
- ptrott2017 7y agore:was he top notch? By 1955 he was an assistant professor of Mathematics and known in his field. In 1956 he organised the Dartmouth conference where the field of Artificial Intellgence - got its name. He was a peer of Claude Channon, Marvin Minsky and Nathanial Rochester - so yes he was top notch. YC audience knows him for Lisp - but he was known for a lot more in his fields of research.