4 ms·
The article you link is from 2010, granted it is ridiculous and does show how ridiculous PV is. Still, would it be not wise to judge a book by it's contents th
by aphextim 7y ago
The article you link is from 2010, granted it is ridiculous and does show how ridiculous PV is.
Still, would it be not wise to judge a book by it's contents than it's cover?
This particular person, Zachary Vorhies, is telling the truth, and the documents are correct could shed some light on the internal workings at google and potentially how they misinformed the public.
He was making according to his own testimony, $250,000+ (including the stock options). What would cause someone to just leave that and turn against the company?
I take anything from PV with a grain of salt, however to instantly dismiss something without actually looking at the contents is not very wise.
- UncleMeat 7y agoIts cover is really bad in this case. Vorhies' twitter is a trove of conspiracy theories (qanon, pizzagate, birtherism, trutherism) and intense antisemitism.
- drak0n1c 7y agoWhat does it matter if he believes the moon is made of cheese or if he emulates Ilhan Omar on Twitter? He provided documents. Shoot the messenger all you want but the substance of what was exposed can’t be denied. He provided way more documents than can be humanly faked, and we all know Google’s internally accessible troves of documentation are easily verifiable.
- lawlessone 7y ago> birtherism Well this one for a start is racism.
- masonic 7y ago"Birtherism" isn't even a thing. Obama met the citizenship constraints for the Presidency regardless of birthplace.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- hortense 7y ago> What would cause someone to just leave that and turn against the company? He didn't leave, he got fired because he was stupid and got caught.
- lonelappde 7y agoGot caught doing what?